• in

    #2752

    >>5218933 pb Q

    These phrases below imply that Trump plans on following his constitutional rights no matter what he signed iin the “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019” (the “Act”), which authorizes appropriations to fund the operation of a number of agencies in the Federal Government through September 30, 2019.

    “My Administration will treat each of these provisions consistent with the President’s constitutional authorities with respect to foreign relations.”

    And

    “my Administration will continue the practice of treating provisions like these as advisory and non-binding.”

    And

    “My Administration will make appropriate efforts to notify the relevant committees before taking the specified actions and will accord the recommendations of such committees all appropriate and serious consideration, but it will not treat spending decisions as dependent on the approval of congressional committees.”


    >>5219376

    You are the news now.

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2750

    Trumps statement is brilliant Deep State loaded the bill with multiple facets to block it and his white house statement just released systemically points out section by section where they tried to block him and he's countering that by citing presidential and constitutional authority.

    Shall we play a game?

    #WWG1WGA #Qanon #PATRIOTS #TheGreatAwakening


    >>5219185

    More
  • in

    #2747

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-border-security-victory/

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-by-the-president-28/

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2746

    Former top FBI lawyer: 2 Trump cabinet officials were ‘ready to support’ 25th Amendment effort

    Former top FBI lawyer James Baker, in closed-door testimony to Congress, detailed alleged discussions among senior officials at the Justice Department about invoking the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office, claiming he was told Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said two Trump Cabinet officials were “ready to support” such an effort.

    During his testimony, Baker acknowledged he was not directly involved in the May 2017 discussions but testified over a two-day period in October that McCabe and Page came to him contemporaneously after meeting with Rosenstein for input in the days after Comey was fired by the president.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-top-fbi-lawyer-2-trump-cabinet-officials-were-ready-to-support-25th-amendment-effort

    DIG ANONS!!!!!

    TWO CABINET MEMBERS IN ~ MAY OF 2017 WE FUCKING TRAITORS


    >>5217756

    They were removed.

    When was Page removed from the investigation?

    What month?

    July 2017? (Early)

    When was Scaramucci hired?

    July 2017? (Late)

    Re: the ‘Scaramucci’ model

    5:5?

    Those who left (majority) did not have a choice.

    ALL remained pro MAGA and loyal to POTUS?

    Why are we attacked by pro MAGA?

    The ‘establishment’ runs deep.

    Logical thinking.

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2745

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-top-fbi-lawyer-2-trump-cabinet-officials-were-ready-to-support-25th-amendment-effort

    Information waterfall.

    Buckle up!

    [Traitors]

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2744

    “But the Lord is faithful, and he will strengthen you and protect you from the evil one." - 2 Thessalonians 3:3

    "God is our refuge and strength, an ever-present help in trouble." - Psalm 46:1

    “And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one." - Matthew 6:13

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2743

    https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/02/16/networks-refuse-cover-senates-no-russia-collusion-report/

    How do you know when the media is biased and pushing a knowingly false (fake) narrative?

    Disinformation campaign designed to buy ‘them’ more time by attempting to ‘con’ enough people in order to remove the duly elected POTUS in order to ‘save’ themselves from prosecution.

    Enemy of the People.

    Q

    More
  • Trending

    in

    #2740

    >>5208800

    https://twitter.com/DevinNunes/status/1091108124700766208


    >>5208844

    You have more than you know.

    Why did [LL] [ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES] grant 'special entry' to Natalia Veselnitskaya (Don Jr. 'set up' meeting)?

    Why was [NV] barred from entering prior to?

    If you have no real evidence of 'Russian Collusion' you must attempt to manufacture.

    Q

    More
  • Trending

    in

    #2738

    https://twitter.com/Scavino45/status/1096628767701848064

    Army Chief of Engineers?

    ALL 'FUTURE' CONSTRUCTION?

    How long have Anons known?

    FAKE NEWS attacking us daily?

    D's are predictable (stupid).

    Nothing to See Here.

    Q

    More
  • Trending

    in

    #2736

    >>5188720

    2653

    Q

    !!mG7VJxZNCI

    6 Jan 2019 - 12:32:35 PM

    [RBG]

    Why was she 'selected'?

    Who appointed her?

    Remember [her] history.

    Ref: 230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

    Highlights:

    >Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)

    >Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145)

    >Insisted on sex-integrating “college fraternity and sorority chapters” and replacing them with “college social societies.” (Page 169)

    >Cast constitutional doubt on the legality of “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as separate holidays.” (Page 146)

    >Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)

    >Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)

    >Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)

    >Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)

    >Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218)

    >An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)

    >Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53)

    >Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right.

    http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/📁

    Who are the doctors 'currently' treating [RBG]?

    What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/?

    What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?

    What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]?

    Who is managing her care?

    Who is 'really' managing her care?

    The clock is ticking.

    PANIC IN DC.

    Q


    >>5188784

    More
  • in

    #2732

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-goodwin-andrew-mccabe-is-a-national-disgrace-and-we-owe-him-a-big-fat-thank-you

    Dark to Light.

    The orders came from the highest office in the land.

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2731

    Think McCabe [#2] interview re: meeting re: 25th amendment

    Think [RR] wear a wire re: attempt to entrap re: 25th….

    [2] accounted for?

    IDEN remaining coming.

    Note ‘Border Open’ context same drop.

    Border has more importance than what is publicly disclosed.

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2730

    >>5186098

    Wife of burned, amputee Veteran here..we are ready, we are with you… we will continue to fight. God speed Q+++


    >>5186193

    Your husband answered the call as a brave and selfless Patriot.

    We are forever grateful for his service & sacrifice to this Country.

    May god bless you and your family.

    Honor & respect.

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2728

    >>5185619

    >https://video.foxnews.com/v/6002418364001/#sp=show-clips

    >DOJ held meetings on how to oust President Trump

    >Why, hours after the election, did seven people travel to an undisclosed location to hold a very private & highly secured/guarded meeting?

    ANONs knew it beforehand.


    >>5185721

    You have more than you know.

    It’s all there.

    Future proves past.

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2727

    >>5185527 (lb)

    I dont think anyone is surprised, got to be the bottom of the pit to harm another human being the way they do. Hang 'em high.


    >>5185578

    https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/430023-senate-passes-bill-to-make-lynching-a-federal-crime?amp

    In the past, what was the punishment re: a TRAITOR?

    Coincidence?

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2726

    Be alert next 10 days.

    FF attempts may be carried out in attempt to change narrative (neg optics).

    High possibility of ‘multiple day’ coverage event forcing pause on news.

    See something > Say something.

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2718

    https://mobile.twitter.com/2runtherace/status/1096166043972747271

    How is that possible?

    On same day as BARR confirmation?

    What a coincidence.

    Define the word ‘plan’.

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2716

    >>5176626

    More importantly, why is the WASH POST leading the attack vs ‘Q’?

    Who owns the WASH POST?

    Who funds Amazon?

    Who targeted NSA re: SURV expose/prevent pre U1 / IRAN?

    Why are we attacked daily by the largest news co’s on the world?

    Use caution - high follower count targeting to direct ‘deep in narrative’ mob as method to remove.

    Q


    >>5176841

    Spelling error by mistake.

    On the move.

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2715

    >>5176617

    Is Sather talking to WaPo a good thing??


    >>5176626

    More importantly, why is the WASH POST leading the attack vs ‘Q’?

    Who owns the WASH POST?

    Who funds Amazon?

    Who targeted NSA re: SURV expose/prevent pre U1 / IRAN?

    Why are we attacked daily by the largest news co’s on the world?

    Use caution - high follower count targeting to direct ‘deep in narrative’ mob as method to remove.

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2714

    Memes are important.

    Mod attached re: FBI only re: last drop re: FIRED.

    If nothing criminal (i.e. treason vs duly elected President) occurred, why then did majority of senior FBI leadership get FIRED/removed?

    What do they ALL have in common?

    CLINTON CONNECTION.

    DOJ later ([2]departures imminent).

    Q

    More
  • in

    #2711

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mcconnell-says-trump-prepared-to-sign-border-security-bill-and-will-declare-national-emergency

    Anons knew last March?

    Do you believe in coincidences?

    At what point is it mathematically impossible?

    #WinningBigly

    Q

    More
Load More
Congratulations. You've reached the end of the internet.