Latest stories

  • #2676

    Optics are important.

    Stealth bombers silent?

    Re_read Mueller re: 'designed to' drops.

    Probe conclusion coming?

    [-30]

    Coincidence 'conclusion' occurring as new AG installed?

    What is the purpose of WHITAKER?

    Re_read drops re: 'Scaramucci' model.

    Purpose?

    Who did Scaramucci remove?

    Effective?

    Optics important?

    What occurs post installed 'BLOCKADE' removal?

    DECLAS?

    [RR] 'complete' removal?

    OIG release of findings?

    How are they preparing to combat [narrative = vital]?

    House intel launch of more 'FAKE' investigations in attempt to retain 'FALSE NARRATIVE' and claim 'POLITICAL ATTACK(S)' if investigated/prosecuted themselves?

    [AS]?

    [SDNY-AG]?

    Attempts to retain 'BLOCKADE'?

    Attempts to prevent public release of the TRUTH?

    ZERO leaks re: HUBER?

    ZERO.

    Do not mistake 'public' silence for inaction.

    "This is not another 4-year election."

    Q

    More
  • #2585

    How do you quell 'growing' protests against you?

    https://www.hannity.com/media-room/manhunt-suspect-in-strasbourg-shooting-identified-was-on-terror-watch-list/

    Notice a pattern?

    Q

    More
  • #2584

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/mark-levin-a-time-for-truth

    Re: #5 Impeachment

    Impeachment requires 2/3rd vote by the Senate.

    https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Senate_Impeachment_Role.htm

    What are the odds of that?

    YOU ARE WATCHING FAKE NEWS FAKE POLITICIANS FAKE HOLLYWOOD ALL PLAY TO THEIR 'DESTROY AMERICA' BASE.

    #FactsMatter

    Q

    More
  • #2582

    Wow what a show!

    President Trump on Tuesday engaged in an extraordinary argument with Democratic congressional leaders over his demand for border-wall funding, threatening a government shutdown if he does not get the money.

    "I will be the one to shut it down," he told House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) at the White House.

    During the contentious meeting in the Oval Office, Pelosi (D-Calif.) repeatedly asked Trump not to discuss the funding request in front of the news media.

    "You will not win," Pelosi told Trump.

    The meeting was scheduled to be closed to the press but the White House unexpectedly opened it to reporters just as Pelosi and Schumer were arriving at the White House.

    The exchanged heightened the sense of drama surrounding government-funding stalemate between Trump and Democrats.

    https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/420782-trump-democrats-battle-over-wall-in-oval-office-spat


    >>4257129

    "You will not win?" - Pelosi

    You didn't think the largest MIL spending bill in history (FY 2019) wasn't going to [indirectly] include funding for the wall did you?

    Learn the Constitution re: vested powers of POTUS re: matters of NAT SEC.

    This was planned and forecasted as the 'border funding' solution from the beginning.

    https://twitter.com/inthematrixxx/status/977540875323691011?lang=en

    Anons had the proof long ago but shining a light back then would have defeated the primary purpose of showing the 'public' the real objective of D's (party of open borders/elim of ICE/elim of security/defend illegals over Americans _Midterm_elec).

    These people are stupid.

    Q

    More
  • #2581

    https://twitter.com/cain_nate/status/1072221511443013633

    Sometimes 'intrusions' have a way of safeguarding people & evidence.

    Sometimes 'intrusions' are a necessary event in order to safeguard chain of custody [post OIG WB status + doc handover protocols].

    Active criminal investigations of this magnitude must be handled w/ extreme care.

    The moment your name went 'live' there was no other choice.

    Keep the faith, Patriot.

    You are never alone.

    Q


    >>4250950

    https://www.scribd.com/document/395382132/U-S-Attorney-Motion-Opposing-DCNF-Request-to-Unseal-FBI-Raid-Documents-December-7-20128

    Read carefully.

    Why is the 'CLINTON FOUNDATION' back in the news?

    NAMES OF WHISTLEBLOWERS BEING LEAKED OR PUT OUT FOR STRATEGIC REASONS?

    NORMALLY, A WHISTLEBLOWER IS PROTECTED AND SHIELDED FROM ALL NON ESSENTIALS (CLAS).

    How do you protect a valuable witness (whistleblower)?

    How do you protect the chain of custody of evidence?

    Name IDEN Public > FBI 'intrusion' > Lawsuit > Response to Lawsuit > Public Reveal (otherwise sealed?)

    Moves & Countermoves.

    Q

    More
  • #2579

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1072471575956504576

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-threatens-to-have-military-build-border-wall-if-pelosi-schumer-wont-budge

    Anons already knew that…

    Q

    More
  • #2578

    https://twitter.com/cain_nate/status/1072221511443013633

    Sometimes 'intrusions' have a way of safeguarding people & evidence.

    Sometimes 'intrusions' are a necessary event in order to safeguard chain of custody [post OIG WB status + doc handover protocols].

    Active criminal investigations of this magnitude must be handled w/ extreme care.

    The moment your name went 'live' there was no other choice.

    Keep the faith, Patriot.

    You are never alone.

    Q

    More
Load More
Congratulations. You've reached the end of the internet.