QPRESS
[Soft Push of New Narrative – Example]
Kimberley Strassel on Twitter: “Conspiracy theorist Adam Schiff is looking for something new, anticipating a Mueller letdown, writes @KimStrassel https://t.co/X9VvGO02xX via @WSJOpinion / Twitter”
Conspiracy theorist Adam Schiff is looking for something new, anticipating a Mueller letdown, writes @KimStrassel https://t.co/X9VvGO02xX via @WSJOpinion
New York Times Opinion on Twitter: “A concise Mueller report would mark the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end, argues @neal_katyal https://t.co/EaESftpXvU / Twitter”
A concise Mueller report would mark the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end, argues @neal_katyal https://t.co/EaESftpXvU
Rob Reiner on Twitter: “From what I understand about the complexities, opaqueness and length of counterintelligence investigations, I’d be surprised if Mueller was able to uncover the breadth of this conspiracy. More digging will have to be done. But there’ll be crimes. And we better get to see them. / Twitter”
From what I understand about the complexities, opaqueness and length of counterintelligence investigations, I’d be surprised if Mueller was able to uncover the breadth of this conspiracy. More digging will have to be done. But there’ll be crimes. And we better get to see them.
What happened to the Mueller hype?
What happened to the Mueller will take down POTUS threats [@JohnBrennan]?
Was MUELLER the ‘insurance’ policy aka BLOCKADE designed to limit/restrict POTUS’ ability to enforce the law?
[TRAITORS]
New talking points being pushed backing away from Mueller as the savior re: excuse A, excuse B, excuse C?
Why are *new* investigations by [AS] being started, if, as he’s stated for almost (2) years, ‘evidence’ exists that ties POTUS to Russia?
If they had evidence, do you think it would have leaked?
If they had evidence, would they be backing away (playing down) the Mueller report about to be released?
First they pushed for a SC.
Now they claim the SC didn’t look deep enough?
IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED – HOW DO THEY KNOW WHERE, WHO, WHEN, WHY, AND HOW DEEP EACH CASE …………..?
IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED – HOW DO THEY KNOW THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE REPORT?
Are *new* investigations designed to be an ‘insurance’ extension?
Designed to prevent POTUS from CLEANING HOUSE?
Attack on political opponent(s) who is/are actively conducting (leading) investigations into the President for XYZ charges beyond Mueller for XYZ reasons (zero evidence to support) – OBSTRUCTION TRAP?
[SDNY] opening ‘private’ investigation for the sole purpose of FINDING A CRIME?
Evidence to support?
Evidence presented?
Does [SDNY] report to AG BARR?
Watch the news.
[MW] opening *new* investigations into the ‘finances’ of POTUS and/or his family?
Why did D’s state ‘things will calm down if we retake the House’ prior to the midterm elections?
Was their plan to retake the House in order to ‘chair’ each respective committee in order to start *new* erroneous investigations in an attempt to retain the BLOCKADE?
Retain the ‘insurance’ policy?
Retain the optical illusion that a crime was committed?
Retain the narrative?
Retain D_base outrage?
Retain D_base obstruction?
Retain D_base support to block POTUS’ agenda?
If you know your opponents move, what advantages that does present?
If you have the TRUTH on your side, what advantages does that present?
If you have full control of the US MIL, what advantages does that present?
If you have complete AUTH TO DECLAS, what advantages does that present?
If you have the SUPPORT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE (PATRIOTS), what advantages does that present?
DO NOT TRUST THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA.
YOU ARE THE MAJORITY.
MUELLER > DECLAS > OIG > TRUTH > JUSTICE
THE GREAT AWAKENING.
YOU ARE THE NEWS NOW.
Q
2019-02-22T05:20:27Z