Latest stories

  • in

    1562814607


    You are witnessing the greatest ‘coordinated’ misinformation attack (campaign) ever to be launched against the public – all in an effort to protect themselves from prosecution (public exposure) and regain power (control). [Attempted removal of the duly elected President of the United States by illegal [manufactured] means] They believed they could win [con] public support by controlled assets (media, tech, H-wood…). These controlled assets set out to immediately create division through the use of a pre_designed misinformation campaign. Groups such as ‘Antifa’ were funded and formed to prevent and/or lessen the appeal for ‘regular’ hard working Americans to gather and express non_narrative viewpoints. Control of this ‘projected narrative’ depends primarily on their ability to ‘con’ the masses into thinking they are the majority. The mindset of most: If the majority of people believe ‘this’, than ‘this’ must be more true than ‘that’ [CIA_CLAS 1-99_56_Human_Psych_&_Emotional_Distress_IIED]. Without public support – they are powerless. We, the People, hold the power. UNITED WE ARE STRONG. — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. You are witnessing the systematic destruction of the OLD GUARD. Q More
  • in

    1552510362


    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/reps-jordan-and-meadows-democrats-dont-care-about-the-integrity-of-the-census If [D's] FIGHT to protect, safeguard, and promote all illegal immigrants as 'rightful' U.S. citizens who should be afforded all benefits and rights accordingly, WHY THEN WOULD THEY FIGHT TO BLOCK THEM FROM BEING 'COUNTED' AS PART OF THE U.S. CENSUS? What would the data show? ALL THAT MATTERS IS POWER. Welcome to the [D] party con. Q More
  • in

    1552494013


    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1105805989545021440 Trolling is FUN! PANIC is GOOD. PANIC increases the RAT population. 'Paid shill brothers' majority of time on top of POTUS' Twitter feed? How is that mathematically possible given volume? Coordination between shills and Twitter? @Jack > He (or she) who laughs last…… Nobody is safe. Q More
  • in

    1552456217

    https://twitter.com/RepRatcliffe/status/1105658231198765057 The Tarmac Meeting. Days Later…. [JC] "No charges are appropriate……….." HOW DID HRC OBTAIN SAP (SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS) ON HER PERSONAL SERVER(S)? ACCESS TO SAP/SCI IS RECORDED IN A LOCAL ACCESS REGISTER OR IN A COMPUTER DATABASE —- WHERE ARE THE RECORDS? IDEN OF 'SPECIFIC' SAP/SCI ON THE SERVER PROVIDES A TARGET (ROADMAP) TO REVIEW ACCESS LOGS TO THAT SPECIFIC PROGRAM? WHAT PROCESS AND/OR SEC CLEARANCE WOULD BE REQ TO WALK-AWAY [TERMINAL_CLEAR] W/ SAP/SCI MATERIAL 'ELECTRONICALLY'? Did a Foreign State gain access to the server? Did a Foreign State gain access to the SAP/SCI material on the server? https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/404192-fbi-denies-trump-claim-that-china-hacked-clintons-private-email IF THE TOP FBI CHAIN OF COMMAND FOR THE MIDYEAR INVESTIGATION WERE *ALL* FIRED DOES ONE CONCLUDE THE INVESTIGATION WAS NOT CONDUCTED PROPERLY? DOES ONE CONCLUDE ALL STATEMENTS MADE BY THE FBI (THINK NO HACK OF SERVER AS SINGLE EXAMPLE) COULD BE FALSE? Take a moment and think about what that means. [ ] TREASON. Q
    >>5654980 More
  • in

    1552456095


    https://twitter.com/RepRatcliffe/status/1105658231198765057 The Tarmac Meeting. Days Later…. [JC] "No charges are appropriate……….." HOW DID HRC OBTAIN SAP (SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS) ON HER PERSONAL SERVER(S)? ACCESS TO SAP/SCI IS RECORDED IN A LOCAL ACCESS REGISTER OR IN A COMPUTER DATABASE —- WHERE ARE THE RECORDS? IDEN OF 'SPECIFIC' SAP/SCI ON THE SERVER PROVIDES A TARGET (ROADMAP) TO REVIEW ACCESS LOGS TO THAT SPECIFIC PROGRAM? WHAT PROCESS AND/OR SEC CLEARANCE WOULD BE REQ TO WALK-AWAY [TERMINAL_CLEAR] W/ SAP/SCI MATERIAL 'ELECTRONICALLY'? Did a Foreign State gain access to the server? Did a Foreign State gain access to the SAP/SCI material on the server? https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/404192-fbi-denies-trump-claim-that-china-hacked-clintons-private-email IF THE TOP FBI CHAIN OF COMMAND FOR THE MIDYEAR INVESTIGATION WERE *ALL* FIRED DOES ONE CONCLUDE THE INVESTIGATION WAS NOT CONDUCTED PROPERLY? DOES ONE CONCLUDE ALL STATEMENTS MADE BY THE FBI (THINK NO HACK OF SERVER AS SINGLE EXAMPLE) COULD BE FALSE? Take a moment and think about what that means. [ ] TREASON. Q More
  • in

    1549925634

    https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1095051195658522625 Let's actually use 'FACTS': Step One: Hype an invented threat of POTUS working w/ the RUSSIANS (disinformation campaign). Step Two: Send FBI/DOJ/CONGRESS/SENATE/C_A/NSA/INTEL/FVEY/etc… to address and investigate the IMAGINARY THREAT. Step Three: Justify the 'SPECIAL COUNSEL' and MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS SPENT as necessary to protect the public and our election process against an imaginary, made-up, non-existent threat (which really is) designed to protect the illegal activities of many elected officials. Step Four: Open 'new' Fake & False investigations as CHAIRMAN of the House Intel Comm to retain disinformation campaign designed to keep liberal/D Americans onboard to regain POWER & PREVENT prosecution - Executive Time! Q
    >>5127462 Life Lesson - [AS] The next time you 'leak' classified information, don't have your phone (or allow phones of the 'unknown' go-between 'students') present. FISA works both ways. Q More
  • in

    1549925096


    https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1095051195658522625 Let's actually use 'FACTS': Step One: Hype an invented threat of POTUS working w/ the RUSSIANS (disinformation campaign). Step Two: Send FBI/DOJ/CONGRESS/SENATE/C_A/NSA/INTEL/FVEY/etc… to address and investigate the IMAGINARY THREAT. Step Three: Justify the 'SPECIAL COUNSEL' and MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS SPENT as necessary to protect the public and our election process against an imaginary, made-up, non-existent threat (which really is) designed to protect the illegal activities of many elected officials. Step Four: Open 'new' Fake & False investigations as CHAIRMAN of the House Intel Comm to retain disinformation campaign designed to keep liberal/D Americans onboard to regain POWER & PREVENT prosecution - Executive Time! Q More
  • in

    1549924144


    https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-fbi-general-counsel-talked-to-hillary-clintons-lawyer-about-comeys-letter-on-weiner-laptop-clinton-emails/ Baker’s heads up on the Kendall call was sent to: Then-Director James Comey; since fired; Then-Associate Deputy Director David Bowdich, who later replaced Andrew McCabe as deputy director; Michael Steinbach, the F.B.I.’s former executive assistant director for national security; Then-Assistant Director of Counterintelligence E.W. Priestap, now retired; James Rybicki, former chief of staff to Comey; FBI intelligence analyst Jonathan Moffa; Former Acting Assistant Director Jason V. Herring; Michael Kortan, FBI assistant director for public affairs, now retired; Former principal deputy general counsel Trisha Anderson; Strzok and Page Does the list above look familiar? Re_read drops re: FBI 'Midyear' OIG ……. & review graphics. Q More
  • in

    1549922454


    If [AS] has seen 'evidence' of collusion and/or POTUS/RUSSIA illegal activities, as he's stated in the past many times across all D-arm media networks, why then is there a need to open 'new' investigations? What about the so-called 'evidence' already seen? How is [AS] making open statements re: MUELLER not investigating POTUS/Deutsche Bank thorough enough if the MUELLER investigation itself is CLASSIFIED? How does [AS] know what MUELLER has/hasn't investigated? FAKE NEWS DESIGNED TO KEEP THE FAKE NARRATIVE IN PLAY [COVER]. You are witnessing the greatest 'DISINFORMATION' campaign to ever be pushed by a political party. Ask yourself, why? FEAR of what? The message must be direct. The WAR is very real. Q More
  • in

    1549907446

    https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign [Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference] Keyword: 'Foreign' What about Domestic interference? >Non-Cit votes by county >Non-Cit promo by county >Non-Cit org by county >Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc >Voter irregularities [internal] >(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?) Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections? Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS? Find the connection. Sometimes a MAP helps. What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities? https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428 What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW? Racist? Voter suppression of minority vote? When is an ID required? Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's? Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID? When is an ID required? Which minorities are they referring to? (illegal immigrants?) Logical thinking. If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit? Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist? https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past? If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite? Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal? https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html Why do D's want POWER at all costs? One example above. Logical thinking. #FactsMatter You are the news now. Q
    >>5123210 More
  • in

    1549907422


    https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign [Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference] Keyword: 'Foreign' What about Domestic interference? >Non-Cit votes by county >Non-Cit promo by county >Non-Cit org by county >Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc >Voter irregularities [internal] >(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?) Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections? Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS? Find the connection. Sometimes a MAP helps. What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities? https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428 What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW? Racist? Voter suppression of minority vote? When is an ID required? Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's? Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID? When is an ID required? Which minorities are they referring to? (illegal immigrants?) Logical thinking. If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit? Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist? https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past? If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite? Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal? https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html Why do D's want POWER at all costs? One example above. Logical thinking. #FactsMatter You are the news now. Q More
  • in

    1549861509

    >>5117410 Screenshot of Qanon. Past 30 days.
    >>5117543 >>5117590 You attack those you fear the most. The sheer volume of attacks by the largest media corporations in the world, should, using common sense and logic, indicate there is something more to the story. Q More
  • in

    1549860641


    >>5117187 Why does the FAKE NEWS media continue to attack a so-called 'conspiracy'? Did you know there's been 1,000+ articles written about this movement by the FAKE NEWS media machine? Google: "Qanon" select: 'News' past 30 days (example) What are they afraid of? People coming together and thinking for themselves? Q More
  • in

    1549848249


    https://www.liveaction.org/what-we-do/investigations/child-sex-trafficking-cover-up/ Why do D's push to fund [PP] using taxpayer dollars ($500m/year)? Where does the money go? Past political donations of [PP]? What is the process of disposal re: aborted fetus? What regulations (who monitors) are in place to ensure that process is being followed? Why is there a new push by D's to legalize late term abortions? See past drops re: [PP] re: Congressional report (WARNING: GRAPHIC) This has nothing to do w/ a woman's right to choose (tactic they deploy when challenged to activate liberals/media hysteria). The focus is on the organization itself. https://www.crainsnewyork.com/awards/kirk-adams-cecile-richards Ask yourself a very simple question: Given the amount of evidence demonstrating illegal & disturbing activities by [PP]- where is the FBI investigation? https://www.foxnews.com/politics/planned-parenthood-under-investigation-by-justice-department-over-sale-of-fetal-tissue [RR][MCCABE] What senior political officials are providing cover to [PP]? Will action be taken by DOJ/FBI? 2019? Q More
Load More
Congratulations. You've reached the end of the internet.