Latest stories

  • in

    1551656915


    https://twitter.com/tedlieu You should update your T-banner pic to properly reflect the crowd size when the event actually started. Have you ever witnessed a public all-out attack by the opposition party against the President of the United States? Those who would normally hide in the shadows are forced into the LIGHT. P-A-N-I-C Patriots in Control. Q More
  • in

    1551655075


    https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1102265163107971077 More statements made (evidence) without presenting facts. If 'evidence' exists(ed), under 'broad' scope #1, would Mueller have the auth to pursue? https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including: (i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and (ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and (iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a). Because no evidence exists(ed) and/or was found by SC/Mueller, was scope #2 enacted in an attempt to go outside of the 'intended engagement'? https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4429989-Rod-Rosenstein-memo-outlining-scope-of-Mueller.html Why is scope #2 classified only to AG/DAG and a select few others (read at terminal only)? If 'evidence' exists(ed), why did R+D members of the Senate conclude NO DIRECT EVIDENCE EXISTS …………..? https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-has-uncovered-no-direct-evidence-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536 If 'evidence' exists(ed), as per your statement released today, again, why did the SENATE (R's + D's) JUST CONCLUDE NO EVIDENCE EXISTS? When will Americans wake up to the [D] party con that is continually pushed without facts, without support, and supported and further pushed by the media arm of the [D] party [FAKE NEWS MEDIA]? Reading the comments on these Tweets further demonstrates the seriousness of media brainwashing in our Country whereby statements are considered fact w/o the need to provide proof. Group-Think. Control of the Narrative. If enough people state the same thing w/o providing evidence and/or support does it become FACTUAL to those caught in the loop? NATIONAL CRISIS. Q More
  • in

    1551645088


    https://www.abc4.com/news/local-news/prosecuting-major-criminals-behind-the-badge-with-utah-s-us-attorneys/1813060694 Sometimes reading between the lines provides… "Huber says every one of the prosecutors is already handling about twenty cases." "They range from domestic terrorism to court-authorized wiretaps of criminal organizations to child pedophiles and those who would exploit our children. Criminal aliens. Big fraud schemes." Q More
  • in

    1551642955


    Ask yourself a very simple, logical, question. What is a FISA warrant/application? Is it a highly confidential [safeguarded] product of the UNITED STATES GOV? If a product of the US GOV _ how did UK/AUS know what was listed inside of the package? Think call to POTUS to prevent DECLAS [sources & methods]. If the US GOV requests UK/AUS [+2] to spy [+ campaign insertion] on an AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRE_NOMINEE + POTUS ELECT, is there a CHAIN OF COMMAND to APPROVE such AUTH? Paper trail of the CHAIN OF COMMAND & umbrella spy metadata? If not tasked & targeted under FVEY - what legal authority existed to engage the targeting? Think Nunes' statement "not through normal collection, gathering, and reporting/oversight re: (FVEY)." Did the dossier provide the 'bulk data' anchor for the spy campaign? What entity paid for the 'research' dossier? Opposition candidate? What US Ally completed the collection of false data? Why was it important to use sources within the UK vs. US? How do you circumvent US LAW? What other 'anchors' were provided to FISC in order to gain the warrant? [DECLAS will show]. Was the 'other' data (collection/process) worse than the dossier? Why didn't FISC require 'in room' presentations of the data prior to 'sign off'? Who signed apps 1-4? Who traveled to UK/AUS post election of POTUS? Why were SECURITY PRIV removed from select 'formerly active' individuals? Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the highest levels of GOV (WW). How do you repair a bridge without closing it down? Q More
  • in

    1551641242


    Why have there been no arrests? Why have 'specific' dates been mentioned only to see no action? Define 'game theory'. Why must disinformation be provided? Define 'open source'. Define 'public purview'. Do we let our enemies walk through the front door? Define 'plausible deniability'. Why was it important to FIRST clean house within the FBI & DOJ (public info)? Why was it important to FIRST clean house within other ABC agencies (non_public info)? What are the duties of the FBI? What are the duties of the DOJ? When does MIL INTEL have jurisdiction? What vested powers does POTUS have re: MIL INTEL vs. ABC agencies re: matters of NAT SEC (HOMELAND)? Think 'umbrella surv'. What agency does the FBI report to? What is the role of the AG? Does the AG oversee the firing of FBI & DOJ senior/mid/lower staff? How many FBI & DOJ were FIRED/FORCED? Does 'Russia' recusal prevent/block AG from this responsibility? What time period did this occur? Who appointed and tasked HUBER? Who appointed and tasked the OIG? Who was AG? [zero leaks - none] Transfer from AG1 to AG2? Why might that be important? How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'? Optics are important. When are optics not important? Think Whitaker. Define 'stage set'. Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command? What 'stage' experience did this person have? Think Bill Clinton impeachment. Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance? If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin? How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue? Define 'thesis' statement. What benefit(s) does this provide BARR? "This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government." - POTUS Logical thinking. Q More
  • in

    1551593863

    >>5476889 Check #2657 YUUUGE When will the public discover that Ted Cruz was also illegally SURV (pre_POTUS_R nomination)? C_A 'illegal' SURV > members of Congress? C_A 'illegal' SURV > members of the Press? C_A 'illegal' SURV > SENATE INTEL COMM? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/10/cia-senate-investigation-constitutional-crisis-daniel-jones https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/01/world/senate-intelligence-commitee-cia-interrogation-report.html Who ordered the SURV? What justification was provided to AUTH SURV of ELECTED OFFICIALS? SURV fall under scope of FISA warrant or internal to Dept or outsourced to FVEY? Reality check - friend or foe, we all spy on each other? Should we be spying on ourselves? Should we be tasking others to spy on ourselves in order to avoid U.S. law? Was FVEY established designed by the INTEL COMM as a backchannel SURV apparatus to avoid domestic laws triggers and Congressional/Senate oversight? What keylogs exist to monitor FVEY intel collection? What ability do former GOV officials have re: ability to access C_LEVEL FVEY offshore data? How did HRC gain access to highest CLAS SAPs (closed system access) and able to transfer to remote/home server? (Q above should scare every single American) How did CHINA locate primary C_A assets within CHINA [187]? Money buys POWER. No punishment [Brennan] by HUSSEIN ADMIN re: SURV of Senate etc? …..
    >>5477001 More
  • in

    1551592766

    >>5476480 lb DECLAS will destroy their last stand [SCHUMER, PELOSI]. FISA will be the start and prepare public for ]HUBER[. FISA = START. FISA = IMMEDIATE CONF OF ILLEGAL ACTS RE: SIGNERS. FISA = IMMEDIATE CONF START OF HUSSEIN SPY CAMPAIGN TO RIG AN ELECTION WAS BASED ON FALSE INFO. FISA = IMPLICATES HRC / D PARTY AS FEEDERS OF FALSE INFO W/ THE INTENT OF SECURING MSM + BLAST/INSURANCE. FISA = IMPLICATES SENIOR MEMBERS OF UK MI5/6/SIS, US INTEL, WH, FVEY, R PARTY (CONGRESS/SENATE) OF KNOWN CORRUPTION IN EFFORT TO RETAIN POWER AND RIG ELECTION + SAFEGUARD EVENT(S) BY POLITICAL KILL TO ACT WHILE IN POWER GIVEN MSM FAKE PUSH RUSSIA NAR. FISA = TIES MSM HEADS (TV/BEHIND/CORP) TO D PARTY OTHER FOREIGN HEADS OF STATE IN CO-OP STRATEGY. FISA BRINGS DOWN THE HOUSE. FOIA DOES NOT INCLUDE FISA. DECLAS BY POTUS KEY PARTS THAT FACTUALLY DEMONSTRATE THE 'DIRTY' 'FAKE' DOSSIER WAS USED AS PRIMARY SOURCE TO SECURE HIGHEST LEVEL OF INTEL SPYING ON PRIMARY REPUBLICAN OPPONENT (+POST ELECTION (INTEL ASSETS FOR/DOM SPYING ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES)) FOR THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. LOGICAL THINKING. PUBLIC AWARENESS - FISA/SPYING FOUNDATION BUILT HUBER. NO SPELLING ERRORS INTENDED - MOBILE / UNKNOWN IF ABOVE. Q
    >>5476681 More
  • in

    1551592720

    >>5476642 So it was known what was happening with DS, but this trip happened in 2016?
    >>5476676 POTUS formally announced his candidacy on June 16, 2015. Why did the HRC campaign actively work to push POTUS as the 'right' candidate for GOP? Why did the HRC campaign publicly attack POTUS' opponents? Why did the HRC campaign want POTUS to be the nominee? Did the FAKE NEWS play along? Think pre_nominee. What 'set up' 'insurance' file was created 'assuming POTUS would become the nominee? POTUS 1. CRUZ 2. Was CRUZ the target of a separate illegal spy campaign? Q More
Load More
Congratulations. You've reached the end of the internet.