Q Clock: January 05, 2019

---

https://twitter.com/TheSpunQ/status/1277331318389592065 If the news is untrustworthy, corrupt, controlled, and simply an extension [arm] of the [D] party… How do you circumvent? [controlled lines of comm [propaganda]] How do you communicate directly with the people? Backchannels are important. Information warfare. Knowledge is >power< Q More

---

A person(s) value: 1. vote 2. monetary value (tax contribution) 3. Why is 'free thought' ridiculed, challenged, and threatened when a person is opposed to the 'mainstream-narrative'? [2] remains fixed (degree allowable by 'economic recession/expansion') [1] remains a variable [1] dependent on a 'controlled' system of information dissemination What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations? What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology? What happens when the news is no longer free from bias? What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent? What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy? What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party? Fact becomes fiction? Fiction becomes fact? When does news become propaganda? Identity creation? How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction? Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name? Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned? ‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion]. [If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true] Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases? Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions? Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources? Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed? Threat to intellectual freedom? Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic? Read again – digest. Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic? THINK BLM PUSH EVERY 4-YEARS. Logical thinking. Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’? How much of the population still believes POTUS colluded w/ RUSSIA due to MSDNC 365-blitz? No MSDNC retraction of POTUS_RUSSIA collusion narrative [propaganda]? _why? Pre/post 2016 election? Why were[are] violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded and allowed to operate within [D] controlled cities [safe-zones]? Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events? Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events? Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]? When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative. Control of the narrative = power When you are blind, what do you see? They want you divided. Divided by religion. Divided by race. Divided by sex. Divided by political affiliation. Divided by class. When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers]. Divided you are weak. Divided you pose no threat to their control. When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep]. When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’. "Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Q More

---

https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge Worth following [DECLAS designation(s)]. Q More

---

https://twitter.com/ODNIgov/status/1266461778126540800 Q More

---

[Sample] https://twitter.com/nytpolitics/status/1266421573126406147 https://www.dailydot.com/debug/qanon-church-omega-kingdom-ministries/ Fear. Panic. Loss of narrative control. You are the news now. Q More

---

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq5WprDuARXrJl6N1aDjY/edit Knowledge is power. Q More

---

Read slowly and carefully. Knowledge is power. https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/119629.pdf >Irregular warfare is far more varied than conventional conflict: hence the importance of an intellectual framework that is coherent enough to provide guidance, and flexible enough to adapt to circumstances. >American counterinsurgency practice rests on a number of assumptions: that the decisive effort is rarely military (although security is the essential prerequisite for success); that our efforts must be directed to the creation of local and national governmental structures that will serve their populations, and, over time, replace the efforts of foreign partners; that superior knowledge, and in particular, understanding of the ‘human terrain’ is essential; and that we must have the patience to persevere in what will necessarily prove long struggles. >Insurgency, however, can and will flourish in the modern environment. The strains created by globalization, by the collapse of weak state structures, by demographic, environmental, and economic pressures, by the ease of cooperation among insurgent groups and criminals, and by the appearance of destructive radical ideologies, all augur a period in which free and moderate governance is at risk. [Insurgency is the organized use of subversion and violence to seize, nullify or chal- lenge political control of a region. As such, it is primarily a political struggle, in which both sides use armed force to create space for their political, economic and influence activities to be effective. Insurgency is not always conducted by a single group with a centralized, military-style command structure, but may involve a complex matrix of different actors with various aims, loosely connected in dynamic and non-hierarchical networks. To be successful, insurgencies require charismatic leadership, supporters, recruits, supplies, safe havens and funding (often from illicit activities). They only need the active support of a few enabling individuals, but the passive acquiescence of a large proportion of the contested population will give a higher probability of success. This is best achieved when the political cause of the insurgency has strong appeal, manipulating religious, tribal or local identity to exploit common societal grievances or needs. Insurgents seek to gain control of populations through a combination of persuasion, subversion and coercion while using guerrilla tactics to offset the strengths of government security forces. Their intent is usually to protract the struggle, exhaust the government and win sufficient popular support to force capitulation or political accommodation. Consequently, insurgencies evolve through a series of stages, though the progression and outcome will be different in almost every case.] Q More

---

https://twitter.com/WSatx/status/1255358435652222976 Q More

---

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1129343742748569601 Be ready. Q More

---

https://nichegamer.com/2020/03/10/billionaire-george-soros-invests-45-million-into-activision-blizzard/ Dates are important. SWC drop [Dec 16] to closure - coincidence? Soros invest [Feb 14] Blizzard - coincidence? Desperate times call for desperate measures. When [why] do you 'expose' what you know publicly? Q More

---

https://twitter.com/TwitterSupport/status/1255285160314056706 All the walls are falling down. Q More

---

https://twitter.com/BOOMER4K/status/1221471163785805826 Worth remembering. Q More

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1222947515387072514 Q

---

>>7966693 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1222666659892207616 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1222637173889011712 Remember these names. Q More

---

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1222947515387072514 Q More

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-relents-says-it-would-be-okay-with-probation-for-michael-flynn Q More