QAnon #2369

FBI’s smoking gun: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’

John Solomon says before you judge the DOJ’s and FBI’s arguments for classification, consider Footnote 43.

[Why not?] [if true] D’s do not want DECLAS [TO PROVE] POTUS was colluding w/ RUSSIA?

Why are D’s opposed to DECLAS if what they say is true?

DECLAS would [PROVE] evidence v. POTUS to obtain FISA WARRANT – why the block?

Define ‘Projection’.

See article above – redactions made to ‘protect’ exposing the REAL TRUTH?

Logical thinking.

McCabe Memos [source] >>> NYT [RR] ‘wear a wire’

Sessions Subpoena >>> McCabe Memos delivery to House

Baker Testimony >>> House [what was learned?][D]

[Next Up][RR] Testimony >>> House

Locked Loaded.

Q

2018-10-08T17:39:07Z