in

QAnon #2369

2018-10-08T17:39:07Z  Q  !!mG7VJxZNCI  363

FBI’s smoking-gun: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’

To declassify or not to declassify? That is the question, when it comes to the FBI’s original evidence in the Russia collusion case.

[Why not?] [if true] D’s do not want DECLAS [TO PROVE] POTUS was colluding w/ RUSSIA?

Why are D’s opposed to DECLAS if what they say is true?

DECLAS would [PROVE] evidence v. POTUS to obtain FISA WARRANT – why the block?

Define ‘Projection’.

See article above – redactions made to ‘protect’ exposing the REAL TRUTH?

Logical thinking.

McCabe Memos [source] >>> NYT [RR] ‘wear a wire’

Sessions Subpoena >>> McCabe Memos delivery to House

Baker Testimony >>> House [what was learned?][D]

[Next Up][RR] Testimony >>> House

Locked Loaded.

Q

2018-10-08T17:39:07Z

Add your submission

Image Video Audio Text Embed

This field is required

Drop Images Here

or

You don't have javascript enabled. Media upload is not possible.

Get image from URL

Maximum upload file size: 10 MB.

Processing...

This field is required

Drop Video Here

or

You don't have javascript enabled. Media upload is not possible.

e.g.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwoKkq685Hk

Add

Supported services:

Maximum upload file size: 20 MB.

Processing...

This field is required

Drop Audio Here

or

You don't have javascript enabled. Media upload is not possible.

e.g.: https://soundcloud.com/community/fellowship-wrapup

Add

Supported services:

Maximum upload file size: 150 MB.

Processing...

This field is required

e.g.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWYrcnehito

Supported services:

Processing...

Report

What do you think?

Leave a Reply