FBI’s smoking-gun: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’
To declassify or not to declassify? That is the question, when it comes to the FBI’s original evidence in the Russia collusion case.
[Why not?] [if true] D’s do not want DECLAS [TO PROVE] POTUS was colluding w/ RUSSIA?
Why are D’s opposed to DECLAS if what they say is true?
DECLAS would [PROVE] evidence v. POTUS to obtain FISA WARRANT – why the block?
Define ‘Projection’.
See article above – redactions made to ‘protect’ exposing the REAL TRUTH?
Logical thinking.
McCabe Memos [source] >>> NYT [RR] ‘wear a wire’
Sessions Subpoena >>> McCabe Memos delivery to House
Baker Testimony >>> House [what was learned?][D]
[Next Up][RR] Testimony >>> House
Locked Loaded.
Q
2018-10-08T17:39:07Z