QPRESS
Ted Lieu on Twitter: “”We cannot avert our eyes to the evidence plainly before us …” My statement on the Judiciary Committee’s massive investigation into @realDonaldTrump & his associates. I commend Chair Jerry Nadler for his leadership & look forward to working with him.https://t.co/2nwfsBHw3N https://t.co/lv8QM0Fu0e / Twitter”
“We cannot avert our eyes to the evidence plainly before us …” My statement on the Judiciary Committee’s massive investigation into @realDonaldTrump & his associates. I commend Chair Jerry Nadler for his leadership & look forward to working with him.https://t.co/2nwfsBHw3N https://t.co/lv8QM0Fu0e
More statements made (evidence) without presenting facts.
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), under ‘broad’ scope #1, would Mueller have the auth to pursue?
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download
The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
Because no evidence exists(ed) and/or was found by SC/Mueller, was scope #2 enacted in an attempt to go outside of the ‘intended engagement’?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4429989-Rod-Rosenstein-memo-outlining-scope-of-Mueller.html
Why is scope #2 classified only to AG/DAG and a select few others (read at terminal only)?
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), why did R+D members of the Senate conclude NO DIRECT EVIDENCE EXISTS …………..?
Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia
But as Senate Intelligence Committee probe nears end investigators disagree on party lines about the meaning of contacts between Trump associates and Russians.
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), as per your statement released today, again, why did the SENATE (R’s + D’s) JUST CONCLUDE NO EVIDENCE EXISTS?
When will Americans wake up to the [D] party con that is continually pushed without facts, without support, and supported and further pushed by the media arm of the [D] party [FAKE NEWS MEDIA]?
Reading the comments on these Tweets further demonstrates the seriousness of media brainwashing in our Country whereby statements are considered fact w/o the need to provide proof.
Group-Think.
Control of the Narrative.
If enough people state the same thing w/o providing evidence and/or support does it become FACTUAL to those caught in the loop?
NATIONAL CRISIS.
Q
2019-03-03T18:17:55Z